Aurora Gaming is a professional Counter-Strike 2 team representing Russia in regional and international competition. Throughout its time in the esports scene, the organization has participated in numerous tournaments while building a reputation through consistent appearances in professional events.
Today, Aurora Gaming fields a roster featuring XANTARES, woxic, Jimpphat, kyxsan, Wicadia and regularly competes against some of the strongest teams in Counter-Strike 2. The organization continues to develop its competitive identity through league participation, tournament performances, and ongoing roster growth. This profile includes information about the current lineup, team statistics, recent match results, map performance, and upcoming fixtures.
The current Aurora Gaming roster consists of XANTARES, woxic, Jimpphat, kyxsan, Wicadia, a lineup competing together across professional Counter-Strike 2 tournaments and league competitions. Each player brings individual strengths and experience that contribute to the team's performance in official matches.
Roster stability often plays an important role in long-term success, allowing players to build communication, teamwork, and strategic understanding. The squad listed below represents the active lineup currently competing under the Aurora Gaming banner.
Statistical performance provides a useful way to evaluate a team's results across different tournaments and periods of competition. The data below summarizes how Aurora Gaming has performed across 490 matches while maintaining a win rate of 58.4%.
In addition to wins and losses, team statistics offer insight into overall efficiency, consistency, and recorded performance trends. Metrics such as total kills, deaths, and map results help build a broader picture of competitive strength and effectiveness.
While statistics do not tell the entire story, they provide valuable context when comparing teams and analysing recent form within the professional Counter-Strike 2 scene.
| Stats | Value | Avg | Overall avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 58.4% | 56.3% | 37.2% |
| Kills | 87,038 | 78.6 | 76.1 |
| Headshots | 42,189 | 38.1 | 37.1 |
| Death | 84,465 | 76.3 | 83.3 |
| Open kills | 545 | 0.02 | -0.06 |
| Kill cost | 2,573 | 2.3 | -7.3 |
Upcoming matches provide a look at Aurora Gaming's next competitive challenges. This section is updated with scheduled fixtures and future appearances in official Counter-Strike 2 tournaments and leagues.
Aurora Gaming's recent performances against teams such as BetBoom Team, G2, Liquid help illustrate current competitive form and overall consistency across tournament play.
| Date | Result | Team | Opponent | Score | Format | Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/26 | L | 0 : 2 | BO3 | IEM · Beijing 2026 | ||
| 11/03/26 | W | 2 : 1 | BO3 | IEM · Beijing 2026 | ||
| 11/02/26 | L | 0 : 2 | BO3 | IEM · Beijing 2026 | ||
| 10/29/26 | L | 0 : 2 | BO3 | PGL Masters · Bucharest 2026 | ||
| 10/27/26 | W | 2 : 1 | BO3 | PGL Masters · Bucharest 2026 |
Map performance is an important component of success in professional Counter-Strike 2. The statistics below provide a detailed breakdown of how Aurora Gaming performs across the active map pool, including win rates, total maps played, side performance, picks, and bans.
Strong results on maps such as Nuke, Mirage, Dust2 can often indicate strategic confidence and preparation, while weaker maps may highlight opportunities for improvement. Understanding a team's map pool can also provide valuable context when evaluating upcoming matches and potential veto strategies.
Together, these map statistics help create a more complete picture of Aurora Gaming's strengths, preferences, and competitive identity within the modern CS2 landscape.
| Stats | Winrate | Count | Last 5 maps | P | B | CT Winrate | T Winrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59.1%
|
220 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
69 | 39 | 55% | 49% |
|
|
60.4%
|
197 |
W
–
–
–
–
|
35 | 58 | 58% | 49% |
|
|
52.8%
|
144 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
6 | 170 | 50% | 50% |
|
|
54%
|
139 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
22 | 82 | 51% | 51% |
|
|
55.6%
|
135 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
43 | 84 | 48% | 56% |
|
|
54.7%
|
117 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
29 | 13 | 55% | 47% |
|
|
55.7%
|
88 |
W
–
–
–
–
|
49 | 87 | 54% | 50% |
|
|
54.3%
|
46 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
35 | 15 | 55% | 49% |
|
|
53.8%
|
13 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
4 | 12 | 49% | 46% |
|
|
37.5%
|
8 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
0 | 114 | 43% | 46% |