Representing Germany, G2 is an active Counter-Strike 2 organization known for competing against top teams across the global CS2 scene. The current lineup consists of huNter-, NertZ, r1nkle, HeavyGod, MATYS, with the team regularly appearing in major tournaments and league competitions.
The active G2 roster consists of huNter-, NertZ, r1nkle, HeavyGod, MATYS, players who currently represent the organization in official Counter-Strike 2 competitions. Team success often depends not only on individual skill but also on communication, teamwork, and long-term roster stability.
Each member of the lineup contributes a unique role within the team's overall structure, helping the organization compete across league seasons, tournament qualifiers, and international events. As the competitive landscape evolves, roster updates and lineup adjustments may occur to meet new challenges and maintain performance standards.
The table below contains information about the current squad and each player's status within the organization.
The statistics below provide an overview of G2's competitive performance across official Counter-Strike 2 matches. With a win rate of 57.6% across 827 matches, the available data highlights both recent form and long-term results.
Additional metrics such as total kills, deaths, map results, and match outcomes help illustrate overall team efficiency. These numbers provide useful context for evaluating G2's strengths, consistency, and performance against opposition in professional tournaments and league play.
| Stats | Value | Avg | Overall avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 57.6% | 55.6% | 37.2% |
| Kills | 144,506 | 83.8 | 76.1 |
| Headshots | 71,535 | 41.5 | 37.1 |
| Death | 139,922 | 81.2 | 83.3 |
| Open kills | 616 | 0.01 | -0.06 |
| Kill cost | 4,626 | 2.7 | -7.3 |
Upcoming matches offer a preview of G2's next competitive challenges. Scheduled fixtures may include league matches, tournament group stages, playoff appearances, and qualification events that contribute to the team's seasonal results.
Following future matches allows fans and analysts to track roster development, current form, and performance against new opponents. As tournament organizers release schedules, this section is updated with the latest known fixtures involving G2.
Recent match results provide insight into G2's current form. The match history table includes opponents, scores, tournament information, and results from the latest official CS2 competitions.
| Date | Result | Team | Opponent | Score | Format | Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/26 | L | 1 : 2 | BO3 | IEM · Beijing 2026 | ||
| 11/02/26 | L | 1 : 2 | BO3 | IEM · Beijing 2026 | ||
| 10/26/26 | L | 1 : 2 | BO3 | PGL Masters · Bucharest 2026 | ||
| 10/25/26 | L | 0 : 2 | BO3 | PGL Masters · Bucharest 2026 | ||
| 10/24/26 | L | 0 : 2 | BO3 | PGL Masters · Bucharest 2026 |
Different maps often reveal a team's strategic strengths and preferences. The data below highlights G2's performance across popular maps, including win percentages and total maps played.
| Stats | Winrate | Count | Last 5 maps | P | B | CT Winrate | T Winrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
61.4%
|
332 |
W
–
–
–
–
|
81 | 57 | 54% | 52% |
|
|
57%
|
286 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
85 | 20 | 52% | 52% |
|
|
52.3%
|
256 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
39 | 198 | 53% | 48% |
|
|
57%
|
207 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
23 | 157 | 58% | 47% |
|
|
58.9%
|
151 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
32 | 33 | 55% | 51% |
|
|
53.2%
|
111 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
0 | 51 | 51% | 53% |
|
|
49.1%
|
110 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
14 | 98 | 55% | 47% |
|
|
45.8%
|
96 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
7 | 150 | 53% | 43% |
|
|
52.6%
|
76 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
16 | 77 | 50% | 53% |
|
|
50%
|
58 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
13 | 49 | 45% | 56% |
|
60%
|
30 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
7 | 22 | 46% | 59% |
|
100%
|
1 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
0 | 0 | 75% | 33% |