FlyQuest is a professional Counter-Strike 2 team representing United States in regional and international competition. Throughout its time in the esports scene, the organization has participated in numerous tournaments while building a reputation through consistent appearances in professional events.
Today, FlyQuest fields a roster featuring jks, aliStair, INS, nettik, Vexite and regularly competes against some of the strongest teams in Counter-Strike 2. The organization continues to develop its competitive identity through league participation, tournament performances, and ongoing roster growth. This profile includes information about the current lineup, team statistics, recent match results, map performance, and upcoming fixtures.
The current FlyQuest roster consists of jks, aliStair, INS, nettik, Vexite, a lineup competing together across professional Counter-Strike 2 tournaments and league competitions. Each player brings individual strengths and experience that contribute to the team's performance in official matches.
Roster stability often plays an important role in long-term success, allowing players to build communication, teamwork, and strategic understanding. The squad listed below represents the active lineup currently competing under the FlyQuest banner.
Statistical performance provides a useful way to evaluate a team's results across different tournaments and periods of competition. The data below summarizes how FlyQuest has performed across 179 matches while maintaining a win rate of 63.7%.
In addition to wins and losses, team statistics offer insight into overall efficiency, consistency, and recorded performance trends. Metrics such as total kills, deaths, and map results help build a broader picture of competitive strength and effectiveness.
While statistics do not tell the entire story, they provide valuable context when comparing teams and analysing recent form within the professional Counter-Strike 2 scene.
| Stats | Value | Avg | Overall avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 63.7% | 61.2% | 37.2% |
| Kills | 25,898 | 72.8 | 76.1 |
| Headshots | 13,019 | 36.6 | 37.1 |
| Death | 24,011 | 67.5 | 83.3 |
| Open kills | 255 | 0.03 | -0.06 |
| Kill cost | 1,887 | 5.3 | -7.3 |
Upcoming matches provide a look at FlyQuest's next competitive challenges. This section is updated with scheduled fixtures and future appearances in official Counter-Strike 2 tournaments and leagues.
FlyQuest's recent performances against teams such as Alter Ego, NEXVOID, Rooster help illustrate current competitive form and overall consistency across tournament play.
| Date | Result | Team | Opponent | Score | Format | Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/01/26 | W | 3 : 0 | BO5 | DFRAG Invitational · 2026 | ||
| 10/30/26 | W | 2 : 0 | BO3 | DFRAG Invitational · 2026 | ||
| 10/30/26 | W | 2 : 0 | BO3 | DFRAG Invitational · 2026 | ||
| 10/27/26 | W | 2 : 1 | BO3 | DFRAG Invitational · 2026 | ||
| 10/27/26 | W | 2 : 0 | BO3 | DFRAG Invitational · 2026 |
Map performance is an important component of success in professional Counter-Strike 2. The statistics below provide a detailed breakdown of how FlyQuest performs across the active map pool, including win rates, total maps played, side performance, picks, and bans.
Strong results on maps such as Cache, Anubis, Dust2 can often indicate strategic confidence and preparation, while weaker maps may highlight opportunities for improvement. Understanding a team's map pool can also provide valuable context when evaluating upcoming matches and potential veto strategies.
Together, these map statistics help create a more complete picture of FlyQuest's strengths, preferences, and competitive identity within the modern CS2 landscape.
| Stats | Winrate | Count | Last 5 maps | P | B | CT Winrate | T Winrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63.5%
|
74 |
W
W
–
–
–
|
42 | 22 | 58% | 52% |
|
|
69.5%
|
59 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
21 | 27 | 59% | 55% |
|
|
57.6%
|
59 |
W
W
–
–
–
|
11 | 50 | 54% | 51% |
|
|
75.9%
|
58 |
W
–
–
–
–
|
37 | 23 | 54% | 63% |
|
|
46.2%
|
39 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
3 | 86 | 55% | 46% |
|
|
47.2%
|
36 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
12 | 93 | 55% | 45% |
|
|
58.3%
|
12 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
6 | 12 | 58% | 54% |
|
|
42.9%
|
7 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
3 | 29 | 63% | 31% |
|
|
28.6%
|
7 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
1 | 45 | 60% | 38% |
|
|
100%
|
5 |
–
–
–
–
–
|
2 | 12 | 62% | 79% |