Leaderboard
Giveaway
60$
S

Sutter

Christian Sutter
26 years Canada
0.99 T rating
LOW 0.99 RATING 2.0
0.99 CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.72 DPR OKAY
- MULTI-KILL N/A 75.3 ADR OKAY
68.1% KAST OKAY
0.64 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 757
Rounds played 1,182
Headshot % 42.8%
Kills / round 0.64
Total deaths 850
Assists / round 0.21
K/D Ratio 0.89
Deaths / round 0.72
Damage / Round 75.3
Saved by teammate / round —
Grenade dmg / Round —
Saved teammates / round —
Maps played 44
Impact rating 0.99

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
Sutter → Detonate Inactive 2023-10-30

Match history for Sutter

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
20/12/21 DTN Valors Inferno 9 - 16 -7 0.79
20/12/21 DTN Valors Overpass 14 - 18 -4 0.83
18/12/21 DTN STRIFE Nuke 13 - 17 -4 0.79
18/12/21 DTN STRIFE Inferno 14 - 18 -4 0.84
17/12/21 DTN BRZ Inferno 22 - 19 +3 1.11

Event history for Sutter

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
2nd
ESEA Premier Relegation - North America season 39 2021
DTN 5 0.59 - 0.75 -16 0.87

FAQ

What is Sutter's CS2 rating and statistics?
Sutter has a 0.99 rating across 19 matches, 44 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.89, ADR is 75.3, KAST is 68.1%, and headshot rate is 42.8%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are Sutter's K/D and ADR numbers?
Sutter has a 0.89 K/D ratio and 75.3 ADR across 19 matches, 44 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 0.99. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for Sutter?
Sutter's available sample covers 19 matches, 44 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is Sutter's best map in CS2?
Sutter's best map in the available sample is Inferno, with a 0.91 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.