En 
Português
Svenska
Türkçe
Română
Polski
Français
Español
Deutsch
Dansk
Suomi
Norsk Nynorsk
Lietuviškai
Magyar
Ελληνικά
日本語
Русский
中文 (中国)
Tiếng Việt
Italiano
Čeština
Nederlands
العربية
Bitcoin
Ethereum
cisbots
Squad
Statistics
| Stats | Value | Avg | Overall avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 50% | 33.3% | 37.2% |
| Kills | 255 | 85.0 | 76.5 |
| Headshots | 134 | 44.7 | 37.2 |
| Death | 254 | 84.7 | 83.7 |
| Open kills | -2 | -0.03 | -0.05 |
| Kill cost | 1 | 0.3 | -7.2 |
Upcoming matches
Match history
Maps
| Stats | Winrate | Count | Last 5 maps | P | B | CT Winrate | T Winrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
50%
|
2 |
L
W
–
–
–
|
0 | 0 | 52% | 47% |
 |
0%
|
1 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
0 | 0 | 40% | 30% |
Betting
About cisbots
cisbots is a professional Counter-Strike 2 team.
Based on the completed matches available in our database, cisbots has played 2 matches, recording 1 wins and 1 losses. This gives the team an overall win rate of 50%.
The page provides the latest information about the cisbots CS2 roster, recent match results, upcoming fixtures, team statistics, map performance, and individual players.
cisbots Map Statistics
cisbots has recorded results across maps including Mirage, Inferno. Based on the available completed match history, the team's strongest map is Mirage, where it has a win rate of 50% across 2 maps.
The most-played map for cisbots is Mirage, with 2 recorded appearances. The team's lowest win rate is currently on Inferno, where it has won 0% of the recorded maps.
Best Maps for cisbots
- Mirage - 50% win rate
- Inferno - 0% win rate
Map statistics can also include the number of times a map was picked or banned, recent results, and separate win rates on the CT and T sides.
cisbots CT and T-Side Performance
On Mirage, cisbots has a CT-side win rate of 52.4% and a T-side win rate of 46.7%. cisbots has performed better on the CT side of this map in the recorded sample.
These figures can help show whether the team performs more effectively when defending on the CT side or attacking on the T side. Results should be interpreted together with the number of maps played, as small samples may produce less representative percentages.
