AE
| Stats | Value | Avg | Overall avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 33.3% | 33.3% | 37.1% |
| Kills | 347 | 57.8 | 76.2 |
| Headshots | 173 | 28.8 | 37.1 |
| Death | 430 | 71.7 | 83.5 |
| Open kills | -17 | -0.15 | -0.06 |
| Kill cost | -83 | -13.8 | -7.3 |
| Stats | Winrate | Count | Last 5 maps | P | B | CT Winrate | T Winrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0%
|
2 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
0 | 0 | 6% | 31% |
|
|
50%
|
2 |
L
W
–
–
–
|
0 | 0 | 21% | 79% |
|
|
0%
|
1 |
L
–
–
–
–
|
0 | 0 | 50% | 0% |
|
|
100%
|
1 |
W
–
–
–
–
|
0 | 0 | 60% | 83% |
ACME is a professional Counter-Strike 2 team representing AE. The currently recorded roster includes 5 active players.
Based on the completed matches available in our database, ACME has played 3 matches, recording 1 wins and 2 losses. This gives the team an overall win rate of 33.3%.
The page provides the latest information about the ACME CS2 roster, recent match results, upcoming fixtures, team statistics, map performance, and individual players.
The current ACME CS2 lineup consists of Faller, Zayed, WIL1AM, Marble and Xpouya.
The active lineup may change following transfers, substitutions, temporary stand-ins, or official roster announcements. The squad information displayed on this page reflects the latest data available in our database.
ACME has recorded results across maps including Mirage, Vertigo, Nuke, Ancient. Based on the available completed match history, the team's strongest map is Ancient, where it has a win rate of 100% across 1 maps.
The most-played map for ACME is Mirage, with 2 recorded appearances. The team's lowest win rate is currently on Mirage, where it has won 0% of the recorded maps.
Map statistics can also include the number of times a map was picked or banned, recent results, and separate win rates on the CT and T sides.
On Ancient, ACME has a CT-side win rate of 60% and a T-side win rate of 83.3%. ACME has performed better on the T side of this map in the recorded sample.
These figures can help show whether the team performs more effectively when defending on the CT side or attacking on the T side. Results should be interpreted together with the number of maps played, as small samples may produce less representative percentages.