RIV

minimal

Facundo Pereyra

33 years

Argentina

1.01 T rating

OKAY 1.01 RATING 2.0

1.01 CT rating

- ROUND SWING N/A 0.65 DPR GOOD

- MULTI-KILL N/A 68.7 ADR LOW

70.0% KAST OKAY

0.65 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 2,504

Rounds played 3,880

Headshot % 59.6%

Kills / round 0.65

Total deaths 2,533

Assists / round 0.11

K/D Ratio 0.99

Deaths / round 0.65

Damage / Round 68.7

Saved by teammate / round —

Grenade dmg / Round —

Saved teammates / round —

Maps played 145

Impact rating 1.01

Transfers

Player	Type	To	Role	Date
minimal	→	River Plate	Starter	2023-10-12

Match history for minimal

Date	Player team	Opponent	Map	K-D	+/-	Rating 3.0
24/07/23	RIV	LRV	Inferno	13 - 23	-10	0.68
24/07/23	RIV	LRV	Ancient	14 - 19	-5	0.75
23/07/23	RIV	BOC	Overpass	6 - 22	-16	0.47
23/07/23	RIV	BOC	Inferno	19 - 21	-2	0.84
22/07/23	RIV	LRV	Inferno	22 - 12	+10	1.59

Event history for minimal

#	Event	Team	Maps	KPR - DPR	+/-	Rating 3.0
3rd	La Liga Pro 2023	RIV	5	0.59 - 0.73	-23	0.87

Teammates

FAQ

What is minimal's CS2 rating and statistics?

minimal has a 1.01 rating across 76 matches, 145 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.99, ADR is 68.7, KAST is 70%, and headshot rate is 59.6%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.

What are minimal's K/D and ADR numbers?

minimal has a 0.99 K/D ratio and 68.7 ADR across 76 matches, 145 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 1.01. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.

How large is the stats sample for minimal?

minimal's available sample covers 76 matches, 145 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.

What is minimal's best map in CS2?

minimal's best map in the available sample is Inferno, with a 1.04 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.