Leaderboard
Giveaway
55$
L

LittleBEER

Joshua Stuckley
26 years USA
0.84 T rating
LOW 0.84 RATING 2.0
0.84 CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.76 DPR LOW
- MULTI-KILL N/A 64.2 ADR LOW
65.0% KAST OKAY
0.57 KPR LOW

Statistics

Total kills 821
Rounds played 1,452
Headshot % 59.2%
Kills / round 0.57
Total deaths 1,109
Assists / round 0.22
K/D Ratio 0.74
Deaths / round 0.76
Damage / Round 64.2
Saved by teammate / round —
Grenade dmg / Round —
Saved teammates / round —
Maps played 72
Impact rating 0.84

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
LittleBEER → Elusive Starter 2026-10-10

Match history for LittleBEER

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
10/10/26 ELU MARS Ancient 5 - 15 -10 0.38
10/10/26 ELU MARS Inferno 9 - 14 -5 0.88
10/12/25 AKIMBO LAG Dust2 19 - 18 +1 1.26
10/12/25 AKIMBO LAG Ancient 4 - 16 -12 0.43
08/12/25 AKIMBO Pulse Mirage 4 - 18 -14 0.42

Event history for LittleBEER

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
3rd Elusive 2 0.78 - 1.61 -15 0.63

FAQ

What is LittleBEER's CS2 rating and statistics?
LittleBEER has a 0.84 rating across 47 matches, 72 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.74, ADR is 64.2, KAST is 65%, and headshot rate is 59.2%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are LittleBEER's K/D and ADR numbers?
LittleBEER has a 0.74 K/D ratio and 64.2 ADR across 47 matches, 72 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 0.84. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for LittleBEER?
LittleBEER's available sample covers 47 matches, 72 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is LittleBEER's best map in CS2?
LittleBEER's best map in the available sample is Inferno, with a 0.88 rating across 1 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.