john

John Bruyea

25 years

Canada

0.85 T rating

LOW 0.85 RATING 2.0

0.85 CT rating

- ROUND SWING N/A 0.73 DPR OKAY

- MULTI-KILL N/A 63.2 ADR LOW

64.3% KAST LOW

0.57 KPR LOW

Statistics

Total kills 409

Rounds played 722

Headshot % 61.4%

Kills / round 0.57

Total deaths 526

Assists / round 0.11

K/D Ratio 0.78

Deaths / round 0.73

Damage / Round 63.2

Saved by teammate / round —

Grenade dmg / Round —

Saved teammates / round —

Maps played 30

Impact rating 0.85

Transfers

Player	Type	To	Role	Date
john	→	Eclipse	Starter	2024-12-29

Match history for john

Date	Player team	Opponent	Map	K-D	+/-	Rating 3.0
02/04/21	Eclipse	Third Impact	Nuke	18 - 21	-3	0.83
02/04/21	Eclipse	Third Impact	Inferno	11 - 16	-5	0.93
17/03/21	Eclipse	GGPR	Dust2	8 - 22	-14	0.34
17/03/21	Eclipse	GGPR	Inferno	15 - 20	-5	0.77
11/03/21	Eclipse	Rise	Inferno	19 - 19	0	0.85

Event history for john

#	Event	Team	Maps	KPR - DPR	+/-	Rating 3.0
7th	ESEA North America season 36 2021	Eclipse	5	0.58 - 0.81	-27	0.74

Teammates

FAQ

What is john's CS2 rating and statistics?

john has a 0.85 rating across 19 matches, 30 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.78, ADR is 63.2, KAST is 64.3%, and headshot rate is 61.4%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.

What are john's K/D and ADR numbers?

john has a 0.78 K/D ratio and 63.2 ADR across 19 matches, 30 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 0.85. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.

How large is the stats sample for john?

john's available sample covers 19 matches, 30 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.

What is john's best map in CS2?

john's best map in the available sample is Inferno, with a 0.85 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.