Leaderboard
Giveaway
60$
I

ice

Aman Seitkaliyev
25 years Kazakhstan
1.03 T rating
OKAY 1.03 RATING 2.0
1.03 CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.69 DPR OKAY
- MULTI-KILL N/A 73.5 ADR OKAY
68.3% KAST OKAY
0.67 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 8,128
Rounds played 12,127
Headshot % 57.5%
Kills / round 0.67
Total deaths 8,424
Assists / round 0.15
K/D Ratio 0.96
Deaths / round 0.69
Damage / Round 73.5
Saved by teammate / round
Grenade dmg / Round
Saved teammates / round
Maps played 452
Impact rating 1.03

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
ice Forward Gaming Starter 2024-01-16

Match history for ice

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
09/01/24 FG 9INE Anubis 7 - 14 -7 0.63
07/10/23 FG
INS
Anubis 8 - 15 -7 0.81
07/10/23 FG
INS
Overpass 7 - 12 -5 0.64
06/10/23 FG CS Anubis 23 - 12 +11 1.66
06/10/23 FG CS Overpass 17 - 14 +3 1.32

Event history for ice

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
21st
PGL Major Copenhagen: Europe Open Qualifier #1 2024
FG 1 0.37 - 0.74 -7 0.63
4th
Winline Insight 4 CS2 2023
FG 4 0.70 - 0.70 +2 1.11

FAQ

What is ice's CS2 rating and statistics?
ice has a 1.03 rating across 207 matches, 452 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.96, ADR is 73.5, KAST is 68.3%, and headshot rate is 57.5%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are ice's K/D and ADR numbers?
ice has a 0.96 K/D ratio and 73.5 ADR across 207 matches, 452 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 1.03. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for ice?
ice's available sample covers 207 matches, 452 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is ice's best map in CS2?
ice's best map in the available sample is Anubis, with a 1.03 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.