Leaderboard
Giveaway
55$

Hatz

Jordan Bajic
28 years Australia
N/A T rating
OKAY 1.11 RATING 2.0
N/A CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.64 DPR GOOD
- MULTI-KILL N/A 74.2 ADR OKAY
72.5% KAST OKAY
0.67 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 7,088
Rounds played 10,613
Headshot % 52.1%
Kills / round 0.67
Total deaths 6,808
Assists / round 0.16
K/D Ratio 1.04
Deaths / round 0.64
Damage / Round 74.2
Saved by teammate / round —
Grenade dmg / Round —
Saved teammates / round —
Maps played 423
Impact rating 1.11

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
Hatz → Sashi Esport Starter 2026-10-23

Match history for Hatz

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
19/10/26 SASHI HS Mirage 8 - 15 -7 0.73
19/10/26 SASHI HS Ancient 19 - 27 -8 0.78
19/10/26 SASHI IS Inferno 10 - 16 -6 0.76
19/10/26 SASHI MOUZ.N Nuke 18 - 15 +3 1.32
14/10/26 SASHI FNC Ancient 8 - 14 -6 0.72

Event history for Hatz

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
4th Sashi Esport 4 0.61 - 0.84 -18 0.90
1-2nd Sashi Esport 4 0.59 - 0.99 -28 0.63

FAQ

What is Hatz's CS2 rating and statistics?
Hatz has a 1.11 rating across 213 matches, 423 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 1.04, ADR is 74.2, KAST is 72.5%, and headshot rate is 52.1%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are Hatz's K/D and ADR numbers?
Hatz has a 1.04 K/D ratio and 74.2 ADR across 213 matches, 423 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 1.11. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for Hatz?
Hatz's available sample covers 213 matches, 423 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is Hatz's best map in CS2?
Hatz's best map in the available sample is Nuke, with a 1.03 rating across 2 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.