Leaderboard
Giveaway
60$

aumaN

Zhihong Liu
31 years China
1.10 T rating
OKAY 1.10 RATING 2.0
1.10 CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.65 DPR GOOD
- MULTI-KILL N/A 78.3 ADR OKAY
70.1% KAST OKAY
0.67 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 6,634
Rounds played 9,871
Headshot % 41.3%
Kills / round 0.67
Total deaths 6,393
Assists / round 0.23
K/D Ratio 1.04
Deaths / round 0.65
Damage / Round 78.3
Saved by teammate / round
Grenade dmg / Round
Saved teammates / round
Maps played 386
Impact rating 1.10

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
aumaN TYLOO Starter 2025-01-19

Match history for aumaN

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
18/01/25 TYLOO ATOX Inferno 7 - 13 -6 0.50
18/01/25 TYLOO ATOX Nuke 14 - 15 -1 0.97
17/01/25 TYLOO IHC Nuke 11 - 14 -3 0.96
14/01/25 TYLOO
SFE
Nuke 16 - 13 +3 1.46
27/02/24 TYLOO ATOX Anubis 5 - 13 -8 0.51

Event history for aumaN

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
6th
eXTREMESLAND 2024
TYLOO 4 0.60 - 0.68 -7 0.97
6th
PGL Major Copenhagen: Asia-Pacific RMR 2024
TYLOO 1 0.33 - 0.87 -8 0.51

FAQ

What is aumaN's CS2 rating and statistics?
aumaN has a 1.10 rating across 179 matches, 386 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 1.04, ADR is 78.3, KAST is 70.1%, and headshot rate is 41.3%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are aumaN's K/D and ADR numbers?
aumaN has a 1.04 K/D ratio and 78.3 ADR across 179 matches, 386 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 1.10. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for aumaN?
aumaN's available sample covers 179 matches, 386 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is aumaN's best map in CS2?
aumaN's best map in the available sample is Nuke, with a 1.13 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.