Leaderboard
Giveaway
60$
A

ApeX

Phillip Gilmore
25 years Australia
N/A T rating
OKAY 1.01 RATING 2.0
N/A CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.73 DPR OKAY
- MULTI-KILL N/A 73.7 ADR OKAY
66.3% KAST OKAY
0.68 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 1,007
Rounds played 1,480
Headshot % 43.2%
Kills / round 0.68
Total deaths 1,075
Assists / round 0.19
K/D Ratio 0.94
Deaths / round 0.73
Damage / Round 73.7
Saved by teammate / round
Grenade dmg / Round
Saved teammates / round
Maps played 64
Impact rating 1.01

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
ApeX BBBMBCBS Starter 2026-03-30

Match history for ApeX

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
22/03/26 BBBMBCBS MnL Mirage 14 - 16 -2 0.76
22/03/26 BBBMBCBS MnL Nuke 9 - 16 -7 0.90
24/02/26 BBBMBCBS UG Nuke 11 - 15 -4 0.74
24/02/26 BBBMBCBS UG Mirage 9 - 17 -8 0.65
22/02/26 BBBMBCBS MF Nuke 10 - 18 -8 0.67

Event history for ApeX

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
2nd BBBMBCBS 2 1.05 - 1.45 -9 0.83
8th BBBMBCBS 8 0.87 - 1.14 -11 0.93
2nd BBBMBCBS 4 1.69 - 3.57 -3 1.25

Teammates

FAQ

What is ApeX's CS2 rating and statistics?
ApeX has a 1.01 rating across 32 matches, 64 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.94, ADR is 73.7, KAST is 66.3%, and headshot rate is 43.2%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are ApeX's K/D and ADR numbers?
ApeX has a 0.94 K/D ratio and 73.7 ADR across 32 matches, 64 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 1.01. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for ApeX?
ApeX's available sample covers 32 matches, 64 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is ApeX's best map in CS2?
ApeX's best map in the available sample is Nuke, with a 0.77 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.