Leaderboard
Giveaway
60$

Straka

Nahuel Vazquez
29 years Argentina
N/A T rating
LOW 0.94 RATING 2.0
0.94 CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.72 DPR OKAY
- MULTI-KILL N/A 72.7 ADR OKAY
64.4% KAST LOW
0.62 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 752
Rounds played 1,221
Headshot % 43.6%
Kills / round 0.62
Total deaths 875
Assists / round 0.18
K/D Ratio 0.86
Deaths / round 0.72
Damage / Round 72.7
Saved by teammate / round
Grenade dmg / Round
Saved teammates / round
Maps played 49
Impact rating 0.94

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
Straka RTT100 Starter 2026-04-21

Match history for Straka

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
27/04/26 RTT100 LDP Inferno 4 - 13 -9 0.31
27/04/26 RTT100 LDP Dust2 13 - 18 -5 0.99
26/04/26 RTT100 ODK Dust2 10 - 16 -6 1.04
12/11/21 Coscu Army RIV Ancient 12 - 25 -13 0.59
12/11/21 Coscu Army RIV Dust2 11 - 20 -9 0.55

Event history for Straka

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
14th RTT100 3 0.62 - 1.07 -20 0.78

FAQ

What is Straka's CS2 rating and statistics?
Straka has a 0.94 rating across 24 matches, 49 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.86, ADR is 72.7, KAST is 64.4%, and headshot rate is 43.6%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are Straka's K/D and ADR numbers?
Straka has a 0.86 K/D ratio and 72.7 ADR across 24 matches, 49 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 0.94. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for Straka?
Straka's available sample covers 24 matches, 49 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is Straka's best map in CS2?
Straka's best map in the available sample is Dust2, with a 0.86 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.