Leaderboard
Giveaway
60$
R

Reminder

Konstantin Naumchuk
22 years Russia
N/A T rating
LOW 0.97 RATING 2.0
0.97 CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.75 DPR OKAY
- MULTI-KILL N/A 71.0 ADR OKAY
67.0% KAST OKAY
0.63 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 541
Rounds played 853
Headshot % 51.2%
Kills / round 0.63
Total deaths 636
Assists / round 0.21
K/D Ratio 0.85
Deaths / round 0.75
Damage / Round 71.0
Saved by teammate / round
Grenade dmg / Round
Saved teammates / round
Maps played 40
Impact rating 0.97

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
Reminder Looking4Org Starter 2025-01-19

Match history for Reminder

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
18/03/25 L4O.ru FDG Ancient 14 - 10 +4 1.32
18/03/25 L4O.ru FDG Mirage 6 - 17 -11 0.54
19/02/25 L4O.ru JS Ancient 8 - 19 -11 0.57
19/02/25 L4O.ru JS Mirage 22 - 12 +10 1.45
24/01/25 L4O.ru NM Mirage 18 - 15 +3 1.19

Event history for Reminder

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
16th
ESL Challenger League Asia season 49 2025
L4O.ru 5 0.65 - 0.69 -5 1.01

FAQ

What is Reminder's CS2 rating and statistics?
Reminder has a 0.97 rating across 27 matches, 40 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.85, ADR is 71.0, KAST is 67%, and headshot rate is 51.2%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are Reminder's K/D and ADR numbers?
Reminder has a 0.85 K/D ratio and 71.0 ADR across 27 matches, 40 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 0.97. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for Reminder?
Reminder's available sample covers 27 matches, 40 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is Reminder's best map in CS2?
Reminder's best map in the available sample is Mirage, with a 1.06 rating across 3 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.