Leaderboard
Giveaway
60$

AdreN

Dauren Kystaubayev
36 years Kazakhstan
0.98 T rating
LOW 0.98 RATING 2.0
N/A CT rating
- ROUND SWING N/A 0.67 DPR OKAY
- MULTI-KILL N/A 66.9 ADR LOW
67.9% KAST OKAY
0.60 KPR OKAY

Statistics

Total kills 10,585
Rounds played 17,586
Headshot % 49.0%
Kills / round 0.60
Total deaths 11,761
Assists / round 0.17
K/D Ratio 0.90
Deaths / round 0.67
Damage / Round 66.9
Saved by teammate / round
Grenade dmg / Round
Saved teammates / round
Maps played 656
Impact rating 0.98

Transfers

Player Type To Role Date
AdreN Team Novaq Starter 2026-09-05

Match history for AdreN

Date Player team Opponent Map K-D +/- Rating 3.0
08/09/26 NVQ WW Mirage 5 - 16 -11 0.56
08/09/26 NVQ WW Inferno 11 - 18 -7 1.01
03/09/26 NVQ RE Ancient 7 - 17 -10 0.56
03/09/26 NVQ RE Anubis 8 - 12 -4 0.86
25/06/26 NVQ RE Dust2 8 - 15 -7 0.77

Event history for AdreN

# Event Team Maps KPR - DPR +/- Rating 3.0
1st Team Novaq 2 0.80 - 1.70 -18 0.79
3rd Team Novaq 2 0.94 - 1.81 -14 0.71
4th Team Novaq 9 0.48 - 0.70 -50 0.82

FAQ

What is AdreN's CS2 rating and statistics?
AdreN has a 0.98 rating across 340 matches, 656 maps. In the same sample, their K/D ratio is 0.90, ADR is 66.9, KAST is 67.9%, and headshot rate is 49%. Together, those numbers summarize fragging efficiency, damage output, round impact, and aim profile without adding unsupported big-event splits.
What are AdreN's K/D and ADR numbers?
AdreN has a 0.90 K/D ratio and 66.9 ADR across 340 matches, 656 maps. Their rating in the same sample is 0.98. K/D shows kill efficiency, while ADR shows average damage output, so reading both together gives a cleaner view than either stat alone.
How large is the stats sample for AdreN?
AdreN's available sample covers 340 matches, 656 maps. That sample is the context for the rating, K/D, ADR, KAST, and map figures shown in this FAQ. Treat those values as the current measured scope rather than a complete career total across every competition.
What is AdreN's best map in CS2?
AdreN's best map in the available sample is Overpass, with a 1.15 rating across 4 maps. Because the sample is map-specific, it works best as a focused performance indicator rather than a complete map-pool verdict. The broader rating and ADR numbers still matter for judging consistency.